Confidential, authorship-first academic support

LSAT Preparation: Logical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension and Argumentative Writing

Since August 2024 the LSAT has had no Analytical Reasoning (logic games) section, so the scored test is two Logical Reasoning sections and one Reading Comprehension section. We help you build the argument analysis and reading skills that now make up the whole scored test.

  • Clear written scope before work starts
  • Explained so you can defend it yourself
  • Confidential, and you remain the author

Get a quote for this service

Three quick questions. No files, no obligation.

  • Confidential
  • You stay the author
  • Written scope first
On this page

Overview

LSAC describes the LSAT as four 35-minute multiple-choice sections: two Logical Reasoning, one Reading Comprehension and one unscored variable section that can look like either, with a 10-minute intermission. Scores range from 120 to 180. LSAT Argumentative Writing is completed separately; it is unscored but must be on file before your score is released, and law schools receive it with your report.

With logic games gone, roughly two-thirds of the scored questions are Logical Reasoning. That shifts preparation toward identifying conclusions and premises, spotting flaws and assumptions, and reading dense passages for structure and viewpoint. Much older LSAT material still spends a third of its pages on games; we help you use what is still relevant and ignore what is not.

From August 2026, LSAC requires most candidates to take the multiple-choice LSAT in person at a test center, with limited remote exceptions, and has introduced an updated LawHub interface. The test's format and content have not changed, but we make sure your practice uses the current interface and a realistic test-center routine.

Who it’s for and the problems it solves

This is for you if you are…

  • Prospective law students in the US and Canada, and international applicants to JD programs
  • Retakers whose previous preparation included logic games
  • Non-native English speakers who find the density of LSAT passages challenging
  • Working professionals preparing part-time over several months

Common problems we help with

  • You understand the explanations after the fact but cannot find the flaw under time pressure
  • Two answer choices always seem right in strengthen, weaken and assumption questions
  • Science or law passages in Reading Comprehension slow you down
  • Your scores vary widely between practice tests
  • You are unsure how to approach the Argumentative Writing prewriting stage

What’s included — and what isn’t

Included

  • Diagnostic using an official LSAC practice test in LawHub
  • Logical Reasoning question families: flaw, necessary and sufficient assumption, strengthen, weaken, inference, principle, parallel reasoning, method and point at issue
  • Formal logic basics: conditional statements, contrapositives, and some/most/all reasoning
  • Reading Comprehension: passage structure, author's viewpoint, comparative passages and question types
  • Pacing and skipping strategy for 35-minute sections
  • Argumentative Writing preparation: using the prewriting analysis time, structuring an argument and addressing perspectives
  • Blind review technique for practice tests
  • Test-center or remote-exception logistics under current LSAC rules

Not included

  • Taking the LSAT or Argumentative Writing for anyone, or assisting during a test
  • Writing your Argumentative Writing sample or law school personal statement for you
  • Promising a score, percentile, admission or scholarship outcome
  • Legal advice of any kind

What you receive

Diagnostic and plan
Accuracy and timing by question family from an official practice test, with a study plan to your target test date.
Tutoring sessions
One-to-one sessions that work through reasoning step by step, then practice under realistic time.
Question family notes
Concise notes on each Logical Reasoning family you struggle with, including common trap answers.
Blind review records
A log comparing your timed and untimed answers to separate knowledge gaps from timing problems.
Writing feedback
Comments on your own practice Argumentative Writing responses: clarity of position, engagement with perspectives and organization.

How it works

  1. Goals

    We discuss your target schools, application cycle and planned LSAT dates.

  2. Diagnose

    You take an official practice test in LawHub; we analyze results by question family and time.

  3. Foundations

    We cover argument structure and conditional logic before advanced question types.

  4. Build and test

    Timed sections and full practice tests with blind review track progress.

  5. Refine

    Final weeks focus on consistency, pacing and Argumentative Writing practice.

Skills and techniques

Argument mapping
Identifying the conclusion, premises and gap before reading answer choices.
Conditional logic
Translating 'only if', 'unless' and 'no' statements and forming valid contrapositives.
Answer elimination
Recognizing typical wrong answers: out of scope, too strong, reversed logic and irrelevant comparison.
Passage mapping
Brief notes on each paragraph's purpose and the author's attitude, to answer structure and viewpoint questions quickly.
Blind review
Revisiting flagged questions untimed before checking answers, to separate reasoning errors from time pressure.
Argumentative Writing routine
Using the prewriting time to weigh perspectives and plan, then writing a clear, well-organized argument in the remaining time.

The LSAT format today

Only three of the four multiple-choice sections count toward your score, and you cannot tell which section is unscored, so every section should be treated as real. The Argumentative Writing task gives you a short prewriting period to analyze the prompt and then time to write; always check LSAC's current specifications, as timing details can be updated.

  • Two Logical Reasoning sections (scored)
  • One Reading Comprehension section (scored)
  • One unscored variable section (Logical Reasoning or Reading Comprehension)
  • Score scale 120–180; Argumentative Writing is unscored but sent to schools

Preparing when Logical Reasoning dominates

Logical Reasoning rewards precise reading. Many errors come from answering the question you expected rather than the one asked: an assumption the argument requires is different from one that would prove it. We work question family by question family so these distinctions become habits.

Reading Comprehension benefits from the same skills. Most passages contain arguments, and questions about an author's purpose or a passage's structure are easier when you read with the same attention to reasoning.

The August 2026 move to test centers

LSAC has returned to in-person testing for most candidates, with remote testing limited to specific accommodation and distance cases. LSAC has also updated the LawHub test interface, adding features such as passage highlighting and a clearer question bar. We make sure you practice in the current interface and plan your test day around travel, check-in and the center's rules.

What the work can look like

Illustrative example — fictional data

Sample diagnostic summary

A graduate working full-time took an official LSAT practice test in LawHub. The person and numbers are invented for illustration.

Pattern

Accuracy on flaw and weaken questions was high, but sufficient versus necessary assumption questions were mostly wrong, and seven questions in the second Logical Reasoning section were guessed because of time.

Focus

Two weeks on conditional logic and the difference between necessary and sufficient assumptions, then timed sets with a checkpoint of question 13 by minute 17.

Reading Comprehension

Accuracy dropped on the comparative passage set; practice added a short comparison note before answering questions.

Illustrative example with invented details. Real plans follow your results, and no score or admission outcome is promised.

See more illustrative examples

What you’ll need to provide

  • Target test dates and application cycle
  • Any previous LSAT scores or practice results
  • A LawHub account (official practice tests are provided through LawHub)
  • Approved accommodations, if any
  • Weekly study availability

You don’t need everything ready to ask for a quote — tell us what you have and we’ll say what’s missing.

What affects price and turnaround

Price depends on

  • Number of sessions and length of your preparation period
  • Your starting point and whether foundational logic work is needed
  • Amount of practice test review and writing feedback requested
  • Individual sessions versus a structured intensive before a specific date

Turnaround depends on

  • Test dates and application deadlines
  • Weekly study time; many students prepare over several months
  • Time between sittings if you plan a retake

Every project is quoted individually. How we price our work.

Questions people ask before starting

Should I still study logic games?

No, not for LSATs taken since August 2024. Analytical Reasoning is no longer part of the test. Some students still find games useful for practicing conditional logic, but it is not necessary.

Is Argumentative Writing scored?

No, but it is required before LSAC releases your score, and law schools can read it. A clear, well-organized response is worth preparing.

Can I still take the LSAT at home?

From August 2026, LSAC requires most candidates to test in person, with limited exceptions for approved accommodations or significant distance from a test center. Check LSAC's current policy for your situation.

How long should I prepare?

Many students prepare over several months. The right length depends on your starting point, target and weekly hours; your diagnostic will help set realistic expectations.

Do you help with law school personal statements?

Yes, as feedback and editing on your own drafts. See our personal statement coaching page.

Plan your LSAT preparation

Share your test date, application cycle and any practice scores. We will suggest a plan and session schedule.

Get a free quote
WhatsApp us