Confidential, authorship-first academic support

Research Services

Good research is mostly decided before the analysis: the review that frames the question, the design that can answer it, the instruments that measure it and the ethics and data plans that let it go ahead. Our research services help at each of those stages, with methods you can explain and defend.

Overview

This pillar covers the parts of a research project that come before, and underpin, the analysis. It spans evidence synthesis (narrative, systematic, scoping and bibliometric reviews), research design and sampling, instrument development and data collection, research ethics and data governance, and applied research for organizations, such as market studies, feasibility studies, policy briefs and monitoring and evaluation frameworks.

What connects these services is a focus on method. We name the standards we work to, such as PRISMA 2020, the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, the Cochrane Handbook, recognized design typologies and data-protection principles, and we record every decision so that you, your supervisor, a reviewer or a funder can follow it. Where a simpler or different design would serve you better, we will tell you.

For students, our role is research support and coaching: we build search strategies, plan designs, draft instruments for your approval and explain the reasoning, while you remain the author of your thesis. For research teams, institutions and organizations we can take on larger parts of a project, with roles and contributions agreed openly.

Who this is for

  • Master's and doctoral researchers planning reviews, designs and fieldwork for a thesis
  • Early-career and established academics preparing review articles, grant-funded studies or ethics submissions
  • Health, education and social care professionals running practice-based or evaluation research
  • Research offices, NGOs and public bodies needing policy research, feasibility work or M&E frameworks
  • Businesses and startups commissioning market or industry research

Services by area

How we approach this work

Question first, method second

We start from what you need to find out and the claim you want to make, then choose the review type, design or instrument that can support it, not the other way round.

Named standards, not vague rigor

We work to recognized frameworks such as PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-ScR, JBI and Cochrane guidance, validated scales, CONSORT or STROBE, and your funder's or committee's templates, and cite them so reviewers can check.

An audit trail for every decision

Search strings, screening logs, sample-size assumptions, instrument revisions and protocol deviations are documented as we go, ready for your methods section or report appendix.

Candid about trade-offs

Each design, sample and data source has limitations. We state them early, suggest mitigations and help you word conclusions that stay within what the evidence supports.

Your authorship, your approval

You approve protocols, instruments and plans before they are used, register them under your name and decide what goes into the final work.

Frequently asked questions

Which research service should I start with?

Start with the earliest stage you have not finished. If your question is unsettled, a review or design consultation comes first; if the design is agreed, move to instruments and ethics. When you contact us, describe where you are and we will suggest a sequence rather than selling separate pieces.

Can one team support several stages of my project?

Yes, and it often helps. A search strategy, a design and a questionnaire built together are more likely to line up with each other, and later analysis can use the same documentation. You can still choose single stages.

Do you work outside health and the social sciences?

Yes. Evidence synthesis and research design principles apply in business, engineering, computer science, the humanities and the natural sciences, although the databases, standards and conventions differ. We adapt to your field's expectations and say so if a field-specific specialist would be better.

How do you keep our data and documents confidential?

We use your materials only for your project, work with anonymized or pseudonymized data where possible, and follow the data-handling arrangements agreed at the start, including any requirements from your ethics approval or data management plan.

How is our contribution acknowledged?

It depends on the work and your context. Students typically acknowledge research or methodological support according to institutional rules. For publications, contribution is described according to the journal's authorship and acknowledgment policies, agreed with you in advance.

Can you get my protocol or ethics application approved?

No one can promise approval by a registry, committee or funder. We help you meet the published requirements and anticipate common reviewer questions, which reduces avoidable delays.

Tell us what you need help with

Describe your project, stage and deadline. We’ll reply with the right service, what we need from you and a quote — no obligation.

WhatsApp us