Choosing within literature reviews
The review types here differ mainly in purpose. A narrative or integrative review builds an argument about what a body of work means. A systematic review answers a focused question, often about effectiveness, using a protocol, exhaustive searching and critical appraisal. A scoping review maps the extent and nature of evidence on a broader topic. A bibliometric analysis uses publication and citation data to show how a field is structured and how it has changed.
If you are unsure, ask what you will do with the result. If you need to know whether something works, choose a systematic review; if you need to know what research exists, a scoping review; if you need to argue for a research gap in a thesis, usually a well-organized narrative review; if you want to show intellectual structure and trends across hundreds or thousands of publications, bibliometrics. Statistical pooling of results is covered by our meta-analysis service in the data analysis pillar.